Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 SO2D 714 - State v. Coston

State v. Coston’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Davis v. United States · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Swint v. Chambers County Commission · Liberty Mortgage Co. v. Frey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if unintentional, this colloquy creates the impression that unless Mr. Coston knew of an attorney available at that hour, he was not entitled to have one present for the interview. In the instant case, it is doubtful that the State met its burden. The defendant was asked if it was his wish to give the statement without an attorney present and if he understood that he did not have to give a statement. His mother was asked if she understood that her son did not have to give the statement”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.