Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 SW2D 472 - Buckner v. Cocke County

Buckner v. Cocke County’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Truesdale v. South Carolina Highway Department · Shields A. Layne v. United States of America, Shields A. Layne v. United States · Yett v. Smoky Mountain Aviation, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... The purpose of the Uniform Act is to establish a right of contribution where two or more persons are jointly or severally liable in tort and is not intended to operate so as to reduce the amount of damages required to fully compensate a claimant for his injuries and losses; moreover, the Act mandates in establishing the right of contribution principles of equity shall apply. T.C.A., § 29-11-103.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.