Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 SW2D 586 - Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Adams v. Petrade International, Inc. (1988), Alford v. Whaley (1990)

29 state decisions

1401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Coates v. City of Cincinnati · Morey v. Doud · Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Lyman Lamb Co. · Sax v. Votteler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In applying Rule 621a and the Texas Supreme Court’s holding in Arndt to the present case, it is clear that the trial court had continuing authority to impose Rule 215 sanctions against appellant Charles William “Chick” Smith, Sr. for post-judgment discovery abuse. It is apparent that the trial court did possess the authority to strike pleadings as a sanction. However, while the court has continuing authority to impose sanctions, the authority to strike pleadings and modify the judgment as a post-judgment sanction is restricted by the time limitation placed on the court’s plenary power. See Rule 329b(f).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[e]ach person who aids or assists in conduct for which a cause of action is authorized by Subsection (a) of this section is jointly and severally liable for damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.