Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 720 SW2D 947 - Nelson v. Nelson

Nelson v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2004

7 state decisions

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Sistare v. Sistare · Matilda Von Ellert Sistare v. Horace Randall Sistare · Nelson v. Nelson · Doerflinger v. Doerflinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Unless otherwise agreed in writing or expressly provided in the decree, the obligation to pay future statutory maintenance is terminated upon the death of either party or the remarriage of the party receiving maintenance.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is evident that the obligation to pay future statutory maintenance term of § 452.370.2 is meant to be understood in terms of maintenance § 452.335. The temper of that statute, as we note, is that support shall not continue beyond actual dependency.... In terms of the purpose of maintenance within the Dissolution of Marriage Act, therefore, the obligation to pay future statutory maintenance can only mean reasonably that the death or remarriage of a dependent spouse terminates the obligation of the other spouse to pay the installments. ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) Lacks sufficient property, including marital property apportioned to him, to provide for his reasonable needs; and (2) Is unable to support himself through appropriate employment ... (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.