Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 A.2d 430 - State v. Vanover

State v. Vanover’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Ornelas v. United States · Schmerber v. State of California · Manson v. Brathwaite · California v. Trombetta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whatever duty the Constitution imposes on the States to preserve evidence, that duty must be limited to evidence that might be expected to play a significant role in the suspect’s defense. To meet this standard of constitutional materiality, evidence must both possess an exculpatory value that was apparent before the evidence was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably available means.” (citation omitted) (footnote omitted)). 7 . The denied instruction read as follows:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.