Shaffer v. Globe Protection, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.2d 1121 · 1983
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Roland Machinery Company v. Dresser Industries Inc (1984), Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy Industries (1984)
34 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Sampson v. Murray · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Blue Ridge Gas Company, Intervenor. Petition for Review of Order of the Federal Power Commission, No. 14583. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Appeal From United States District Court for the District of Columbia · Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Cases applying Sec. 1292(a)(1) have held that other incidental orders or issues nonappealable in and of themselves but in fact interdependent with the order granting or denying an injunction may also be reviewed, but only to the extent that they bear upon and are central to the grant or denial of the injunction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“directly control[s] or [is] in some way inextricably bound to the denial of the preliminary injunction so as now to merit review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy which is not available unless plaintiffs carry their burden of persuasion as to all of the [four] prerequisites.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.