Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 F.2d 1125 - Mattes v. United States

Mattes v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

721 F.2d 1125 · 1983

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 100 Md. App. 283 - Department of Health and Mental Hygiene v. Shrieves (1994), Parker v. Bowen (1986)

26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

2101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2341 · 5 U.S.C. § 557 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 181 (Packers and Stockyards Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 203 · 7 U.S.C. § 213

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. · Kissinger v. Halperin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “sitting in review of an ALJ's initial decision, is authorized by statute 'to substitute its judgment for that of the ALJ.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'are based on witness credibility determinations.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.