Rudolph v. Steinhardt’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.2d 1324 · 1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 286A · 31 U.S.C. § 5118
Relies on Norman v. Baltimore & or · Guaranty Trust Co. v. Henwood · Williams v. Aeroland Oil Company · Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper Co. · 422 So. 2d 884 - Steinhardt v. Rudolph
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An obligation issued containing a gold clause or governed by a gold clause is discharged on payment (dollar-for-dollar) in United States coin or currency that is legal tender at the time of payment. This paragraph does not apply to an obligation issued after October 27, 1977.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not apply to obligations issued on or after the date of enactment of this section.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“gold clause contracts entered into after the enactment of the bill.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.