Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

721 F.2d 253

Docket Nos. 83-1077, 83-1111.

Deere & Co. v. Farmhand, Inc.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 10, 1983. Decided Nov. 22, 1983.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-11-22

2 counsel of record

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))

Relies on Deere & Co. v. Farmhand, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1983-11-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2017

3 federal appellate · 5 district ·

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Theodore R. Scott, McDougall, Hersh & Scott, Chicago, Ill., L.R. Voigts, Nyemaster, Goode, McLaughlin, Emery & O'Brien, Des Moines, Iowa, for Deere & Co.; John M. Nolan, Deere & Company, Moline, Ill., of counsel.

Alan G. Carlson, Earl D. Reiland, Douglas J. Williams, Merchant, Gould, Smith, Edell, Welter & Schmidt, Minneapolis, Minn., for Farmland, Inc.

Before ROSS, McMILLIAN and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Plaintiff Deere & Company brought this action against Farmhand, Inc. under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1125(a), and the common law of unfair competition. Deere sought to enjoin Farmhand from selling certain front-end loaders that Farmhand had copied from Deere and had painted "John Deere green." Farmhand counterclaimed for damages and attorneys' fees under the antitrust laws. After a non-jury trial, the district court, the Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, found in favor of Farmhand on the allegations of Deere's complaint and in favor of Deere on the allegations of Farmhand's counterclaim. Deere has appealed and Farmhand has cross-appealed.

¶2

We have carefully studied the record, including the trial court's opinion, the briefs and the arguments of the parties to this action. We find no merit to the arguments for reversal of the decision below in any respect, and accordingly affirm pursuant to Rule 14 of the rules of this court on the basis of Judge O'Brien's opinion. Deere & Company v. Farmhand, Inc., 560 F.Supp. 85 (S.D.Iowa 1982).

/721/f2d/253 · .json · Public domain