United States v. Martin

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted July 8, 1982. Decided Nov. 28, 1983.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1983-11-28

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on Berger v. United States · Illinois v. Andreas · Rinaldi v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1983-11-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2022

14 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1

William J. Friedl, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.

¶2

Gloria Ybarra, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding.

¶4

Before GOODWIN and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and MARSHALL,* District Judge.

ORDER

¶5

The government's petition for rehearing of 693 F.2d 77 is allowed.

¶6

Based on the authority of Illinois v. Andreas, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3319, 77 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1983), the judgment is affirmed.

The Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation