Venable v. Tj Haislip’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.2d 297 · 1983
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Sanders v. Clemco Industries (1988), Bally Export Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Balicar, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation, and Juliano Internacional S.A., a Foreign Corporation (1986)
36 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Helfat v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Reamer v. Beall · Flaks v. Koegel · Textile Banking Co. v. Rentschler · V. T. A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Regardless of how it is styled, a post-judgment motion filed within ten days of entry of judgment that questions the correctness of a judgment is properly construed as a Rule 59(e) motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A 'motion to reconsider an order disposing of a motion that tolled the running of the time for appeal typically does not again toll the running of the appeal period,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wagoner v. J Wagoner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.