Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 F.2d 331 - United States v. Loyd

United States v. Loyd’s Empirical Analysis

721 F.2d 331 · 1983

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2022

11 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

8019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Town of Mashpee v. Mashpee Tribe · Rich v. United States · United States v. Gitcho · United States v. Stefanson · United States v. Shorter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals] has adopted the Ninth Circuit standard for analyzing alleged violations of [FRCP] Rule 41 relating to search warrants: [U]nless a clear constitutional violation occurs, noncompliance with Rule 41 requires suppression of evidence only where (1) there was ‘prejudice’ in the sense that the search might not have occurred or would not have been so abrasive if the rule had been followed, or (2) there is evidence of intentional and deliberate disregard of a provision in the Rule. United States v. Loyd, 721 F.2d 331, 333 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Stefanson, 648 F.2d 1231, 1235 (9th Cir.1981) (citations omitted) (emphasis added)).”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We adopt the standard articulated in United States v. Ste-fanson,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.