Friedberg v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.2d 445 · 1983
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 18 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Mayburg v. Secretary of Health & Human Services (1984), Estate of Landers ex rel. landers v. Leavitt (2008)
5 federal appellate · 18 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395C (§ 1811 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395D (§ 1812 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395X (§ 1861 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Social Security Board v. Nierotko · Livingston v. Califano · Curtin v. Harris · Rowe v. Finch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, even if the Secretary's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence, [a court] may review whether the Secretary, in making his findings, applied the correct legal standards to the facts presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he findings of the Commissioner of Social Security as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.