Sandefur v. Cherry’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.2d 511 · 1983
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Martinez v. Rodriquez · Sandefur v. Cherry · State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Daughdrill · Sandefur v. Cherry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto, for the purposes of the question to be certified to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, that: 1. The record in this case establishes that the State of Louisiana, under its Medical Assistance Plan-Medicaid, makes reimbursement to ophthalmologists for services which are within the scope of practice,of optometrists, but does not make reimbursement to optometrists for performing those services to Medical eligible persons. 2. The question to be certified to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana should read: Do the state employees and officials charged with adoption of the Louisiana Medical Assistance Plan, the Medical Assistance Program Manual, Providers’ Manual and practices and procedures thereunder have discretion under R.S. 37:1066 and R.S. 49:185 to provide therein for provision of all eye care services to Medicaid eligible persons by ophthalmologists and other medical doctors to the exclusion of optometrists, except for routine eye examinations for eligible recipients under the age of 21 in the Early Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment program and refractions following cataract surgery for eligible recipients?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sandefur v. Cherry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.