Hauskins v. Stratton’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.2d 535 · 1983
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2012
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 403 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co. · Mahoney v. Fisher · Hawkins v. Bennett · Oasis Oil Refining Corporation v. Armada Transport & Refining Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Trustees cannot decide any matter or resolve any dispute because of a tie vote”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jackson v. Smith · Jackson v. Smith“fund trustees have no power to resolve issues that are properly the subject of collective bargaining.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.