Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 F.2d 672 - United States v. Gagnon

United States v. Gagnon’s Empirical Analysis

721 F.2d 672 · 1983

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2014
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2014

14 federal appellate ·

1501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] co-conspirator is vicariously liable for the acts of another co-conspirator even though he may not have directly participated in those acts, his role in the crime was minor, or the evidence against a co-defendant more damaging.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “. . . I just thought that perhaps because of the seriousness of the trial, and because of—whichever way the deliberations go, it kind of—it upset me, because—of what could happen afterwards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no indication of whether Gagnon or the other defendants expressly or impliedly implicated their willingness to be absent from the conference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.