United States v. Bame’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.3d 1025 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 3301
Relies on Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. · O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Quick v. Donaldson Co. · Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp. · ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... [i]t should make no difference that [a plaintiff] pleaded and pursued its statutory claims.... It would be anomalous to allow unjust enrichment recovery, despite law to the contrary, merely because the plaintiff fashioned the pleadings in a certain way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Petters Co.“[f]or federal common law to apply, the government would need to identify 'a specific, concrete federal policy or interest that is compromised by [state] law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only when 'there is a significant conflict between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.