Barnard v. Theobald’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.3d 1069 · 2013
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Pearson v. Callahan · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he ultimate decision whether to award prejudgment interest lies within the court's sound discretion, to be answered by the balancing of equities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to compensate for the loss of use of money due as damages from the time the claim accrues until judgment is entered[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.