Kinisu v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.3d 29 · 2013
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1186A (§ 216 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Makhoul v. Ashcroft · Pan v. Gonzales · Yatskin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) Documentation relating to the degree to which the financial assets and liabilities of the parties were combined; (ii) Documentation concerning the length of time during which the parties cohabited after the marriage and after the alien obtained permanent residence; (iii) Birth certificates of children born to the marriage; and (iv) Other evidence deemed pertinent. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valdez v. Lynch“so long as it is supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alzaben v. Garland“the record evidence would 'compel a reasonable factfinder to reach a contrary determination.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alzaben v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.