United States v. Gant’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.3d 505 · 2013
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Feemster · United States v. Yielding · United States v. Pizano · United States v. Diggs · United States v. Richart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This court reviews a district court's decision to admit evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) for abuse of discretion and reverse[s] only when such evidence clearly had no bearing on the case and was introduced solely to prove the defendant's propensity to commit criminal acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence must be (1) relevant to a material issue; (2) similar in kind and not overly remote in time to the crime charged; (3) supported by sufficient evidence; and (4) higher in probative value than prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.