Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 F.3d 802 - Vitrano v. United States

Vitrano v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

721 F.3d 802 · 2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Begay v. United States · Chambers v. United States · Sykes v. United States · Sykes v. United States · Airborne Beepers & Video, Inc. v. AT & T Mobility LLC

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in deciding whether to grant leave to amend, and typically justice does not require leave to amend where there is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “courts should grant leave to amend freely only 'when justice so requires.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.