United States v. Mathias’s Empirical Analysis
721 F.3d 952 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Katz v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Oliver v. United States · Hester v. United States · United States v. Dunn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In assessing whether a particular area is curtilage, we determine whether the area in question is so intimately tied to the home itself that we should extend the Fourth Amendment's protection to it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.