Ray v. Consolidated Rail Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 45 U.S.C. § 151 (Railway Labor Act)
Relies on Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Buell · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States · Thompson v. Thompson · Lancaster v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company · Taylor v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“threatened, harassed, and intimidated [him] maliciously and oppressively, negligently and intentionally in order to cause personal injury to [him] and to cause mental and emotional injury to [him].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“), under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.