Rogers v. Nathan’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Webb · Reese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · Allstate Insurance v. Miller · Jewell v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance · 44 Md. App. 547 - Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Webb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Claims against two or more defendants can be aggregated for the purpose of attaining the jurisdictional amount, as a general proposition, if they are jointly liable to plaintiff.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.