Realtime Data, LLC v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 35 U.S.C. § 271
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n · In re Seagate Technology, LLC · McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendants have been and are now directing infringing and/or indirectly infringing by inducement and/or contributing to infringement of the [Realtime patent] in this District and elsewhere in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 including making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale, one or more data compression products and/or services, covered by at least one claim of the [Realtime patent].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.