Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 NE2D 258 - In Re Litz

In Re Litz’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Consolidated Matter of Christoff · Matter of Conway · Matter of Darling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “• Statements concerning the character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of a suspect in a criminal investigation. • Statements concerning the performance or results of any examination or test or the identity or nature of physical evidence expected to be presented. • Any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of a defendant or suspect in a criminal case. • The fact that a defendant has been charged with a crime unless there is included a statement explaining that the charge is merely an accusation and that the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.