Stewart v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on City of West Covina v. Perkins · State v. Keihn · Fields v. State · Brown v. State · Burdine v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) A person who operates a motor vehicle: (1) while the person's driving privileges are validly suspended under this chapter or IC 9-12-2 (repealed July 1, 1991) and the person knows that the person's driving privileges are suspended; or (2) in violation of restrictions imposed under this chapter or IC 9-12-2 (repealed July 1, 1991) and who knows of the existence of the restrictions; commits a Class D felony. (b) Service by the bureau of notice of the suspension or restriction of a person's driving privileges under subsection (a)(1) or (a)(2): (1) in compliance with section 5 of this chapter; and (2) by first class mail to the person at the last address shown for the person in the bureau's records; establishes a rebuttable presumption that the person knows that the person's driving privileges are suspended or restricted....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]o obtain convictions for driving while suspended or after being adjudicated an habitual violator, the State need prove what the statutes explicitly provide, (1) the act of driving, and (2) a license suspension or an [habitual traffic violator] adjudication, plus the mens rea we have inferred: (8) that the defendant 'knew or should have known.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[The essence of the HTV offense was the act of driving after being so determined. The focus is not on the reliability or non-reliability of the underlying determination, but on the mere fact of the determination.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Starks · State v. Hammond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.