Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

721 N.W.2d 175

Docket Docket Nos. 130943, 130944. COA Nos. 256415, 257384.

Lezell v. Hiller, Inc.

Charlene Beth LEZELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HILLER, INC., and Orchard Mall, LLC,[1] Defendants-Appellees.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2006.

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 2006-09-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2007

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-09-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

NOTES

¶2[1] The Court of Appeals caption incorrectly identified the second defendant as "Oakland Mall, LLC" instead of "Orchard Mall, LLC." The caption has been corrected here.

/721/nw2d/175 · .json · Public domain