Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 P2D 1088 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Voss v. Ralston · Smith v. State · State v. Stern · 134 Cal. App. 694 - People v. French · Simmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where fraud is an element of a statutory crime, the result of the fraudulent misrepresentation is the same whether the person upon whom the defendant works his or her wiles relies upon the misrepresentations or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.