Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 P2D 604 - State v. Dunlop

State v. Dunlop’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
7
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Miranda v. Cooper (1992), Doe v. State (2008)

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

17019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Whalen v. United States · Bell v. United States · Jeffers v. United States · 38 Cal. 3d 345 - Wilkoff v. Superior Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e will overrule a prior decision only when `clearly convinced [that] the rule was originally erroneous or is no longer sound because of changed conditions, and that more good than harm would result from a departure from precedent'. . . .”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen several [distinct types of sexual penetration] occur in the course of a single incident, the offense prohibited by the statute has been violated several times over.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person commits the crime of assault in the third degree if that person . recklessly ... places another person in fear of imminent serious physical injury by means of a dangerous instrument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.