The Florida Bar v. Weisser’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 581 So. 2d 1305 - State v. James · 558 So. 2d 994 - The Florida Bar v. Bauman · 616 So. 2d 31 - The Florida Bar v. Neckman · 640 So. 2d 1098 - The Florida Bar v. Lawless · 690 So. 2d 1284 - The Florida Bar v. Lecznar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intentionally violates the terms of a prior disciplinary order and such violation causes injury to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“presumed correct and will be upheld unless clearly erroneous or without support in the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ultimate responsibility to impose an appropriate sanction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.