Evans v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 694 So. 2d 678 - Reese v. State · 640 So. 2d 106 - Brown v. State · 514 So. 2d 432 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he violation here was substantial and undeniably had a negative effect on defense counsel's ability to properly prepare for trial. At the time defense counsel was preparing for trial and assessing the evidence against his client, there were no eyewitnesses. Green's changed testimony immediately changed the type of case defense counsel was dealing with. With an eyewitness to the crime, defense counsel's strategy would surely be different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Evans“in failing to disclose the change in testimony to the defense, the State failed to meet its obligations under Rule 3.220(j) [of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.