721 So. 2d 242 - Ex Parte Deramus’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
April 2008
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. State Ex Rel. Davis · McCleskey v. Kemp · Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Bell Et Al. · 500 So. 2d 1232 - Tarver v. State · 500 So. 2d 1256 - Ex Parte Tarver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`some objection was taken . . . during the progress of the trial, based on [that] defect,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`any defect in the administration of the oath'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Do you and each of you solemnly swear or affirm that you will well and truly answer all questions asked of you by the Court as to your general qualifications to serve as a juror and that you will well and truly try all issues and execute all writs of inquiry submitted to you and true verdicts render according to the law and evidence, so help you God? Although the record does not establish that the oath was given a, second time to the petit jurors who were selected and empaneled to hear [defendant’s] case, the record clearly establishes that the oath the clerk gave to the jury venire, which contained all those persons who later served on the petit jury, tracks the language of [both the statute and the court rule].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Arellano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.