Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 So. 2d 255 - Cole v. State

721 So. 2d 255 - Cole v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2010

7 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. California · New York v. Ferber · Griffin v. United States · 363 So. 2d 1020 - Thomas v. State · 447 So. 2d 199 - Willis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““b. When used to describe matter that contains a visual reproduction of an act of sado-masochistic abuse, sexual intercourse, sexual excitement, masturbation, genital nudity, or other sexual conduct, such term means matter containing such a visual reproduction that itself lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because of the general and nonspecific character of the grounds assigned in support of Cole's motion, we cannot say the trial court's ruling was in error. . . . `[T]he trial court should not be made to cast about for reasons why a statute might be unconstitutional.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This argument, however, was not preserved for appellate review because it was never presented to the trial court to allow that court to make a ruling on this issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.