State v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 357 So. 2d 410 - McNamara v. State · Florida Bar v. Schell · 464 So. 2d 137 - State v. Navarro · 497 So. 2d 640 - Acensio v. State · Obregon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is settled law that while a trial court has jurisdiction of a case, and upon appropriate motion or objection made by either counsel, it has the inherent power to reconsider a previous ruling made on a motion to suppress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott“that there was no `new or additional' evidence presented at trial concerning the legality of the search or substantially affecting the credibility of the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.