Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 SO2D 384 - FORTUNE INS. v. Everglades Diagnostics

FORTUNE INS. v. Everglades Diagnostics’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 658 So. 2d 523 - Haines City Community Dev. v. Heggs · Gernat v. Gernat · 695 So. 2d 394 - Fortune Ins. Co. v. Pacheco · 368 So. 2d 906 - Lyons v. Krathen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given the pervasiveness of automobiles and PIP coverage in this state, we deem an erroneous interpretation of this law to be important enough for certiorari.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While we are required to read statutes in their entirety, we are not free to add provisions to parts of a statute under the guise of such reading.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “personal injury protection benefits paid pursuant to this section shall be overdue if not paid within thirty days.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.