Jamison v. Hilton’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 599 So. 2d 1058 - Cole v. Celotex Corp. · 370 So. 2d 521 - Lott v. Haley · 366 So. 2d 1381 - Burmaster v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 2 · 314 So. 2d 350 - Trahan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company · 525 So. 2d 527 - Cambridge Corner Corp. v. Menard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in Maltby v. Gauthier, 506 So.2d 1190, 1193 (La.1987) `[w]hen the Legislature, in enacting prescriptive statutes potentially affecting existing causes of action, fails to require parties to exercise vested rights within a reasonable time, the courts should refrain from supplying this legislative lapse.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In the absence of contrary legislative expression, substantive laws apply prospectively only. Procedural and interpretive laws apply both prospectively and retroactively, unless there is a legislative expression to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“merely defines and restricts the time period during which service of citation of a filed petition must be made on a named governmental defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.