ONE 1992 TOYOTA v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2018
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross · California v. Acevedo · Soldal v. Cook County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have probable cause to believe that the subject property has been used, directly or indirectly, to accomplish the various violations that are enumerated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Atwood v. Tullos“No motor vehicle that is of the type required to be titled under the Mississippi Motor Vehicle Title Law is subject to forfeiture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Atwood v. Tullos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.