Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

721 So. 2d 716

Docket No. 91270.

State v. Rubin

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Steven RUBIN, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 24, 1998.

Rehearing Denied December 8, 1998.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1998-09-24

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2001

4 state decisions

Relies on 719 So. 2d 284 - State v. MacKey · 587 So. 2d 620 - Hines v. State · 697 So. 2d 161 - Rubin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-09-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Michael J. Neimand, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Petitioner.

¶2Ira N. Loewy of Bierman, Shohat, Loewy, Perry & Klein, P.A., Miami, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We have for review Rubin v. State,697 So.2d 161 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), which certified conflict with Hines v. State,587 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), concerning scoresheet errors. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4).

¶5We resolved this issue in State v. Mackey,719 So.2d 284 (Fla.1998), by disapproving a rule of per se reversal in cases involving scoresheet errors. To that extent, we disapproved Mackey and approved Hines. Accordingly, that portion of the district court's decision that applied the per se rule of reversal is quashed. We remand for the Third District's reconsideration of this case in light of our decision in Mackey.

¶6It is so ordered.

¶7HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

/721/so2d/716 · .json · Public domain