Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 SO2D 767 - State v. Warner

State v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2016

23 state decisions

130199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · 308 So. 2d 27 - Davis v. State · 672 So. 2d 30 - Goins v. State · 340 So. 2d 922 - Ingram v. Pettit · 188 So. 2d 24 - State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which the defendant has shown remorse.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We agree with the state that a proffer is not evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “we refrain from condemning the practice per se,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.