Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 SO2D 818 - Carridine v. State

Carridine v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ree v. State · Murray v. State · 712 So. 2d 374 - Pease v. State · 660 So. 2d 701 - State v. Colbert · 664 So. 2d 55 - Wilcox v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At sentencing, the court orally imposed, and announced the reasons for, an upward departure sentence. A sentencing guidelines score sheet, which included a departure checklist, was filed the day of the sentencing. The four grounds justifying departure were checked off on the checklist with an "X". However, the court inadvertently neglected to sign the checklist or the supplemental guidelines score sheet. * * * Appellant timely filed a motion in the trial court to correct sentencing errors, arguing that the court's failure to timely file signed written reasons for departure required the court to impose a sentence within the guidelines. At a hearing, the court characterized the failure to sign the documents as a scrivener's error, and over objection, signed the checklist nunc pro tunc to the date of the resentencing hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sign and enter of record a judgment of guilty or not guilty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.