¶1We affirm the final summary judgment entered on Appellant’s counterclaim. We have not, however, considered the order finding Appellee is entitled to attorney’s fees, as that issue is not ripe for review. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
721 So. 2d 823
Sheen v. Smith Barney, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 16, 1998
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-12-16
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2006
4 state decisions
Relies on 632 So. 2d 130 - Winkelman v. Toll
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1998-12-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →