Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 So. 2d 841 - State v. Brazley

721 So. 2d 841 - State v. Brazley’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Knighton · State v. Lee · 495 So. 2d 1262 - State v. Bates · State v. Allen · 440 So. 2d 110 - State v. Shilling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Louisiana’s discovery rules “are intended to eliminate unwarranted prejudice arising from surprise testimony and evidence,” and when the defendant “is lulled into a misapprehension of the strength of the state’s case through the prosecution’s failure to disclose timely or fully,” basic unfairness may result.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.