721 So. 2d 974 - State v. Ray’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 376 So. 2d 136 - State v. Reaves · 312 So. 2d 282 - State v. Rembert · 616 So. 2d 713 - State v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to quash is a mechanism by which a defendant raises pretrial pleas or defenses which do not go to the merits of the criminal charge. The motion to quash concerns a defense which, if successful, requires dismissal of the indictment or information regardless of the issue of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.