Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 721 SW2D 319 - Nehman v. State

Nehman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably McFarland v. State (1996), Leday v. State (1998)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

130198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Wade · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘[C]ourts indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver’ of fundamental constitutional rights ... A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege. The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lara v. State
  2. “that if police initiate interrogation after a defendant's assertion, at an arraignment or similar proceedings, of his right to counsel, any waiver of the defendant's right to counsel for that police-initiated interrogation is invalid. (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Montoya v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.