Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 A2D 1098 - Commonwealth v. Townley

Commonwealth v. Townley’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Commonwealth v. Yerby · 454 Pa. Super. 605 - Commonwealth v. Mattis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To establish harassment, there must be proof the accused acted with an intent to harass,- annoy, or alarm the other person. This unique element of intent is not required for simple assault. To prove simple assault, an intentional or reckless effort to cause bodily injury must be shown. Bodily injury is not a part of harassment. These crimes have distinct mental elements, and distinct types of harm are addressed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.