Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 A2D 1103 - Diffenderfer v. Staner

Diffenderfer v. Staner’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2021

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

401998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Disbarment of Sabiston · In Re Nomination Petition of Wesley · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Van Youngman · Simmons v. Pacor, Inc. · Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Hercules, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) existence of a high degree of risk of some harm to the person, land or chattels of others; (b) likelihood that the harm that results from it will be great; (c) inability to eliminate the risk by the exercise of reasonable care; (d) extent to which the activity is not a matter of common usage; (e) inappropriateness of the activity to the place where it is carried on; and (f) extent to which its value to the community is outweighed by its dangerous attributes.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) One who carries on an abnormally dangerous activity is subject to liability for harm to the person, land or chattels of another resulting from the activity, although he has exercised the utmost care to prevent the harm. (2) This strict liability is limited to the kind of harm, the possibility of which makes the activity abnormally dangerous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.