Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 A2D 36 - In Re An. C.

In Re An. C.’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2016

15 state decisions

70199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Robinett v. United States · Miller v. Avirom · Hazuka's Case · In re L.W. · Minor v. States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is generally contrary to a child's best interest `to take [her] out of a loving home, when she ha[s] lived [there] for a substantial period of time as a result of her biological parents' inability or unwillingness to care for her.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although, as we held in T.J., the wishes of a fit parent as to the custody of his or her child constitute an important factor in the judge's calculus, the TPR judge could rationally find, and she did find, that in this case the father's statement of preference came far too late, that the proposed alternative placements were unrealistic, and that further delay would be detrimental to the children's well-being.”). 17 . See In re K.D., 26 A.3d at 781 -82 n. 10 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The TPR judge could properly conclude that if the parental rights of the father and the mother were not terminated, the children's future would be completely unsettled, and they would have to `wait and see' whether placement with a blood relative could be arranged at some unspecified time in the future.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re RES

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.