Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 722 F.2d 1019 - United States v. Calvente

United States v. Calvente’s Empirical Analysis

722 F.2d 1019 · 1983

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
8
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably United States v. Young (1984), United States v. Tutino (1989)

27 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions

3001983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Bumper v. North Carolina · United States v. Watson · Cardillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) whether there has been prosecutorial misconduct in the discriminatory granting of immunity or coercion of a witness to invoke the privilege; 2) whether the immunized witness’ testimony would have been “material exculpatory and not cumulative;” and 3)whether the evidence could have been obtained from another source.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The government has the burden of proving consent voluntarily given by a preponderance of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.