Shah v. Td Hutto Oj Jm Icc Ra Ap Ss’s Empirical Analysis
722 F.2d 1167 · 1983
Citation profile
119 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 158 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Reyes (1985), Harris v. Hutchinson (2000)
119 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · United States v. Robinson · Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon motion filed not later than 30 days after the expiration [of the appeal period].”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] bare notice of appeal should not be construed as a motion for extension of time, where no request for additional time is manifest.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This 30-day time limit is 'mandatory and jurisdictional'.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.